<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP RFP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bythebayou.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581</link>
	<description>Greetings from Norhill Heights, Houston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend link dump for March 15 &#171; Off the Kuff</title>
		<link>http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581&#038;cpage=1#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend link dump for March 15 &#171; Off the Kuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>[...] GOP RFP fail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GOP RFP fail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581&#038;cpage=1#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>That Flash comment is pretty silly, but I think this RFP is actually written FOR people who don&#039;t understand the internet, not BY those people.  It looks to me like someone wanted to justify having Flash developers, and instead of giving a real reason why (in a business case), they gave a &quot;50,000 foot&quot; view and stuck it in the RFP.  

What makes me cringe is that there are &quot;no limitations on design&quot; because the GOP will be &quot;in&quot; on the &quot;entire process&quot; and making sure that it conforms to their &quot;exact specifications.&quot;  Delivery date: +45 days.  Sounds like a nightmare in the making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Flash comment is pretty silly, but I think this RFP is actually written FOR people who don&#8217;t understand the internet, not BY those people.  It looks to me like someone wanted to justify having Flash developers, and instead of giving a real reason why (in a business case), they gave a &#8220;50,000 foot&#8221; view and stuck it in the RFP.  </p>
<p>What makes me cringe is that there are &#8220;no limitations on design&#8221; because the GOP will be &#8220;in&#8221; on the &#8220;entire process&#8221; and making sure that it conforms to their &#8220;exact specifications.&#8221;  Delivery date: +45 days.  Sounds like a nightmare in the making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob sama</title>
		<link>http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581&#038;cpage=1#comment-3553</link>
		<dc:creator>rob sama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bythebayou.com/?p=2581#comment-3553</guid>
		<description>How pathetic.  I&#039;m glad you noticed the disconnect between the the RNC and those who would be inclined to vote Republican.  The disconnect is wider than I ever remember it being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How pathetic.  I&#8217;m glad you noticed the disconnect between the the RNC and those who would be inclined to vote Republican.  The disconnect is wider than I ever remember it being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
